Has a working strategy12 strategies tested

Best trading strategy for WLD

On WLD, the strongest tested strategy is Breakout — Sharpe 1.39 net of fees, slippage and funding over 2024-08-15 → 2026-07-05, across 67 trades. Of the 12 single-asset strategies we backtested on WLD, 2 cleared the Sharpe 1.0 bar. Every number below is a real Hyperliquid backtest, not a claim.

By Keel Research · Data as of 2026-07-05 · how these backtests were produced
Best Sharpe
1.39
Breakout
Cleared the bar
2 / 12
Data coverage
99%
of the window
First bar
2024-08-15

The WLD strategy leaderboard

Every strategy ranked by net Sharpe. Rows that clear the Sharpe 1.0 bar are highlighted; failed and wiped-out runs stay visible — click any strategy for its full multi-asset backtest.

StrategyNet SharpeReturnMax DDTradesConfidence
Breakoutclears bar1.39+477.6%37.7%67moderate
MACD Crossoverclears bar1.02+29.0%19.1%411ok
Confluence0.92+18.8%9.2%212ok
ADX Trend0.77+21.2%11.8%49moderate
Mean Reversion0.46+3.7%8.8%39moderate
AI Trading Bot0.32+7.1%12.9%70moderate
Supertrend0.13+1.4%19.1%24low
Ichimoku Cloud0.07-62.1%83.6%21low
Supertrend Bollinger0.01-0.2%7.3%6very low
MA Crossover-0.23-8.0%30.4%110ok
RSI-0.56-5.3%8.7%12low
Stochastic-1.31-18.4%20.2%50moderate

2024-08-152026-07-05 · net of fees, slippage, and funding · one engine, one window, one cost model for every strategy — no cherry-picking.

The return column reflects each strategy’s own position sizing (some hold only a small slice of one coin), so Sharpe — which isn’t affected by leverage — is the fair way to rank them. 3 strategies that rank coins against each other (like funding carry and momentum ranking) can't run on a single asset, so they're left out.

Run the best WLD strategy — Breakout

Breakout cleared the bar on WLD (Sharpe 1.39). Start it on your own Hyperliquid account, or fork it and change the settings first.

At $1,000, Breakout's worst historical dip on WLD was about $377. Free account, your own keys — Keel only places the trades.

What this is: a single-asset backtest of 12 systematic strategies on WLD, on real Hyperliquid data, net of fees, slippage and funding. A high Sharpe on a low trade count is a small sample, not a promise. Where nothing clears the bar, we say so. Past performance does not predict future results, and this is not investment advice.

Related tools

Strategies on other assets

See the full strategy library or the per-asset index.
Questions

WLD strategy FAQ

What is the best trading strategy for WLD?

On WLD, the strongest tested strategy is Breakout — Sharpe 1.39 net of fees, slippage and funding over 2024-08-15 → 2026-07-05, across 67 trades. Of the 12 single-asset strategies we backtested on WLD, 2 cleared the Sharpe 1.0 bar. Every number below is a real Hyperliquid backtest, not a claim.

How were these WLD strategies tested?

Each strategy was backtested on WLD alone, using its own position sizing, from 2024-08-15 to 2026-07-05 — net of fees, slippage and funding, on the same engine Keel uses to trade live. We rank by Sharpe, which isn't affected by leverage. The return column reflects each strategy's built-in sizing, so a cautious strategy can look smaller than a full-size position would.

Do any WLD strategies actually beat buy-and-hold?

2 of 12 tested strategies cleared our Sharpe 1.0 bar on WLD. The leaderboard shows each one's Sharpe, return, drawdown and trade count so you can judge risk-adjusted performance, not just headline return.