Best trading strategy for WIF
On WIF, none of the 12 strategies we tested clears the Sharpe 1.0 bar — the best was Supertrend at Sharpe 0.71. The honest answer for WIF: these systematic strategies did not work well enough here to run. Nothing below is hidden — that is the point.
The WIF strategy leaderboard
Every strategy ranked by net Sharpe. Rows that clear the Sharpe 1.0 bar are highlighted; failed and wiped-out runs stay visible — click any strategy for its full multi-asset backtest.
| Strategy | Net Sharpe | Return | Max DD | Trades | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supertrend | 0.71 | +22.7% | −13.6% | 22 | low |
| Ichimoku Cloud | 0.52 | -8.6% | −83.7% | 37 | moderate |
| Confluence | 0.33 | +5.2% | −9.9% | 223 | ok |
| MA Crossover | 0.09 | +0.6% | −15.2% | 94 | moderate |
| Supertrend Bollinger | 0.08 | +0.6% | −8.8% | 9 | very low |
| AI Trading Bot | 0.07 | +0.1% | −23.4% | 88 | moderate |
| Breakout | -0.12 | -72.7% | −83.0% | 85 | moderate |
| ADX Trend | -0.58 | -14.4% | −28.3% | 59 | moderate |
| MACD Crossover | -0.83 | -16.0% | −23.0% | 332 | ok |
| Mean Reversion | -1.16 | -10.9% | −13.1% | 30 | moderate |
| RSI | — | 0.0% | −0.0% | 0 | very low |
| Stochastic | — | 0.0% | −0.0% | 0 | very low |
2024-08-15 → 2026-07-05 · net of fees, slippage, and funding · one engine, one window, one cost model for every strategy — no cherry-picking.
The return column reflects each strategy’s own position sizing (some hold only a small slice of one coin), so Sharpe — which isn’t affected by leverage — is the fair way to rank them. 3 strategies that rank coins against each other (like funding carry and momentum ranking) can't run on a single asset, so they're left out.
None of the 12 strategies we tested worked well enough on WIF on its own. See the coins where strategies did work, or build and backtest your own on WIF for free.
What this is: a single-asset backtest of 12 systematic strategies on WIF, on real Hyperliquid data, net of fees, slippage and funding. A high Sharpe on a low trade count is a small sample, not a promise. Where nothing clears the bar, we say so. Past performance does not predict future results, and this is not investment advice.