No strategy clears the bar12 strategies tested

Best trading strategy for LINK

On LINK, none of the 12 strategies we tested clears the Sharpe 1.0 bar — the best was MA Crossover at Sharpe 0.67. The honest answer for LINK: these systematic strategies did not work well enough here to run. Nothing below is hidden — that is the point.

By Keel Research · Data as of 2026-07-05 · how these backtests were produced
Best Sharpe
0.67
MA Crossover
Cleared the bar
0 / 12
Data coverage
99%
of the window
First bar
2024-08-15

The LINK strategy leaderboard

Every strategy ranked by net Sharpe. Rows that clear the Sharpe 1.0 bar are highlighted; failed and wiped-out runs stay visible — click any strategy for its full multi-asset backtest.

StrategyNet SharpeReturnMax DDTradesConfidence
MA Crossover0.67+16.2%9.6%146ok
Ichimoku Cloud0.58+31.9%63.0%24low
Mean Reversion0.49+4.0%6.4%44moderate
Supertrend Bollinger0.40+6.0%11.2%12low
RSI0.38+2.1%2.9%11low
Supertrend0.34+6.6%15.1%23low
Confluence0.28+3.2%7.0%304ok
MACD Crossover-0.03-1.2%12.8%545ok
ADX Trend-0.08-1.8%9.8%49moderate
Stochastic-0.10-1.8%11.5%49moderate
AI Trading Bot-0.18-5.1%18.3%135ok
Breakout-0.72-79.0%87.7%104ok

2024-08-152026-07-05 · net of fees, slippage, and funding · one engine, one window, one cost model for every strategy — no cherry-picking.

The return column reflects each strategy’s own position sizing (some hold only a small slice of one coin), so Sharpe — which isn’t affected by leverage — is the fair way to rank them. 3 strategies that rank coins against each other (like funding carry and momentum ranking) can't run on a single asset, so they're left out.

Nothing cleared the bar on LINK — yet

None of the 12 strategies we tested worked well enough on LINK on its own. See the coins where strategies did work, or build and backtest your own on LINK for free.

What this is: a single-asset backtest of 12 systematic strategies on LINK, on real Hyperliquid data, net of fees, slippage and funding. A high Sharpe on a low trade count is a small sample, not a promise. Where nothing clears the bar, we say so. Past performance does not predict future results, and this is not investment advice.

Related tools

Strategies on other assets

See the full strategy library or the per-asset index.
Questions

LINK strategy FAQ

What is the best trading strategy for LINK?

On LINK, none of the 12 strategies we tested clears the Sharpe 1.0 bar — the best was MA Crossover at Sharpe 0.67. The honest answer for LINK: these systematic strategies did not work well enough here to run. Nothing below is hidden — that is the point.

How were these LINK strategies tested?

Each strategy was backtested on LINK alone, using its own position sizing, from 2024-08-15 to 2026-07-05 — net of fees, slippage and funding, on the same engine Keel uses to trade live. We rank by Sharpe, which isn't affected by leverage. The return column reflects each strategy's built-in sizing, so a cautious strategy can look smaller than a full-size position would.

Do any LINK strategies actually beat buy-and-hold?

No — on LINK, none of the 12 strategies we tested cleared the Sharpe 1.0 bar. We publish that verdict rather than hide it.