Marginal — close, but below the bar12 strategies tested

Best trading strategy for AVAX

On AVAX, no strategy clearly cleared our Sharpe 1.0 bar. The closest was Supertrend at Sharpe 0.85 — treat it as marginal, not a green light. We ran 12 single-asset strategies on AVAX; the full leaderboard, including the ones that failed, is below.

By Keel Research · Data as of 2026-07-05 · how these backtests were produced
Best Sharpe
0.85
Supertrend
Cleared the bar
0 / 12
Data coverage
99%
of the window
First bar
2024-08-15

The AVAX strategy leaderboard

Every strategy ranked by net Sharpe. Rows that clear the Sharpe 1.0 bar are highlighted; failed and wiped-out runs stay visible — click any strategy for its full multi-asset backtest.

StrategyNet SharpeReturnMax DDTradesConfidence
Supertrend0.85+18.9%11.2%14low
Supertrend Bollinger0.70+7.8%5.0%5very low
Ichimoku Cloud0.53+24.5%61.7%25low
MACD Crossover0.43+5.9%9.8%458ok
Breakout0.06-33.0%63.2%86moderate
MA Crossover0.06-0.0%10.8%108ok
Confluence-0.27-3.4%14.5%263ok
ADX Trend-0.35-4.7%10.8%45moderate
AI Trading Bot-0.42-9.4%18.5%117ok
Mean Reversion-0.47-3.0%8.8%32moderate
Stochastic-1.18-11.2%15.1%30moderate
RSI0.0%0.0%0very low

2024-08-152026-07-05 · net of fees, slippage, and funding · one engine, one window, one cost model for every strategy — no cherry-picking.

The return column reflects each strategy’s own position sizing (some hold only a small slice of one coin), so Sharpe — which isn’t affected by leverage — is the fair way to rank them. 3 strategies that rank coins against each other (like funding carry and momentum ranking) can't run on a single asset, so they're left out.

Start from the closest — Supertrend

Nothing cleared our bar on AVAX, but Supertrend came closest (Sharpe 0.85). Fork it and see if you can push it further — or run it as it is.

At $1,000, Supertrend's worst historical dip on AVAX was about $112. Free account, your own keys — Keel only places the trades.

What this is: a single-asset backtest of 12 systematic strategies on AVAX, on real Hyperliquid data, net of fees, slippage and funding. A high Sharpe on a low trade count is a small sample, not a promise. Where nothing clears the bar, we say so. Past performance does not predict future results, and this is not investment advice.

Related tools

Strategies on other assets

See the full strategy library or the per-asset index.
Questions

AVAX strategy FAQ

What is the best trading strategy for AVAX?

On AVAX, no strategy clearly cleared our Sharpe 1.0 bar. The closest was Supertrend at Sharpe 0.85 — treat it as marginal, not a green light. We ran 12 single-asset strategies on AVAX; the full leaderboard, including the ones that failed, is below.

How were these AVAX strategies tested?

Each strategy was backtested on AVAX alone, using its own position sizing, from 2024-08-15 to 2026-07-05 — net of fees, slippage and funding, on the same engine Keel uses to trade live. We rank by Sharpe, which isn't affected by leverage. The return column reflects each strategy's built-in sizing, so a cautious strategy can look smaller than a full-size position would.

Do any AVAX strategies actually beat buy-and-hold?

No — on AVAX, none of the 12 strategies we tested cleared the Sharpe 1.0 bar. We publish that verdict rather than hide it.