Supertrend vs MACD Crossover
Backtested on the same Hyperliquid perps over 2024-08-15 → 2026-09-29, at the same costs and on the same engine: MACD Crossover wins on risk-adjusted return, a Sharpe of 1.87 against 0.99. Supertrend rode out the shallower worst drawdown (32%), and MACD Crossover made the most in total. When Bitcoin was trending up, MACD Crossover gained more; when it was falling, MACD Crossover held up better.
- Net Sharpe
- 0.99
- Total return
- +105.0%
- Max drawdown
- −31.6%
- Trades
- 679
- Win rate
- 67%
- Net Sharpe
- 1.87
- Total return
- +408.8%
- Max drawdown
- −33.3%
- Trades
- 2,746
- Win rate
- 60%
MACD Crossover came out ahead here (Sharpe 1.87 vs 0.99). Start it on your own Hyperliquid account, or fork it and change the settings first.
At $1,000, MACD Crossover's worst historical dip was about $333. Free account, your own keys — Keel only places the trades.
When each one wins
Total return while Bitcoin was trending up vs trending down (split by Bitcoin’s 100-day trend line).
| Market | Supertrend | MACD Crossover | Higher return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rising Bitcoin | +20.3% | +162.4% | MACD Crossover |
| Falling Bitcoin | +52.4% | +59.7% | MACD Crossover |
What this is: a head-to-head backtest of Supertrend and MACD Crossover on the same Hyperliquid window, costs and engine — net of fees, slippage and funding. The overlay is growth of $100 (normalized), not a return promise. A higher Sharpe is not a guarantee; both strategies draw down. Past performance does not predict future results, and this is not investment advice.