Long Privacy / Short DeFi Yield

A dollar-balanced long/short index — long privacy coins, short new-gen DeFi yield protocols. Both sides are in YTD drawdown; the basket extracts the relative spread. +22% YTD with Sharpe 1.96 and only -13% max drawdown.

By Keel Research Team · Updated May 12, 2026

Backtest performance

Window: Jan 1 — May 1, 2026 (YTD). Equal-weight per leg, dollar-balanced long/short. $10,000 start → $12,224 end.

Total return
+22.2%
Sharpe ratio
1.96
Max drawdown
-12.7%
Total trades
53

Verified 2026-05-12 against the live Keel backtest engine on Hyperliquid price data. Past backtest performance is not indicative of future returns.

Deploy or customize

Bring this index live on Hyperliquid via Keel, or open the Index Builder to tweak weighting, add a short side, or change the asset list.

Opens the Keel strategy editor with the index pre-built. New users sign in first; the config persists through sign-up.

Components

Long basketLong

TickerCategoryYTD returnTarget weight
XMRL1-9.1%12.5%
DASHL1-11.8%12.5%
ZECL1-33.7%12.5%
ZENL1-37.6%12.5%

Short basketShort

TickerCategoryYTD returnTarget weight
ONDODeFi-30.5%12.5%
SYRUPDeFi-33.2%12.5%
ETHFIDeFi-44.2%12.5%
ENADeFi-52.2%12.5%

Spread extraction: neither side rallied YTD. Privacy fell -23% avg; DeFi yield fell -40% avg. The L/S basket extracts the ~17-point spread. When one side goes neutral or positive, the basket leverages up — that’s the asymmetric upside.

Methodology

Same Parallel-branch L/S construction as the AI/L2 rotation: long basket builds positive forecast at half the target leverage, short basket builds negative forecast at half, WeightConcatenator merges into a single dollar-balanced position.

The deeper thesis: privacy coins and yield-bearing DeFi sit on opposite ends of the regulatory-risk continuum. Privacy is maximally-decentralized (Monero ring signatures, Zcash zk-SNARKs); new-gen DeFi yield depends on TradFi rails (stablecoins, tokenized treasuries, restaking infrastructure with corporate counterparties). Their narratives are anticorrelated to compliance pressure.

Over a longer window (12M) privacy went +179% while new-gen DeFi compressed — this spread was much larger in 2024-2025 than today. The YTD result reflects mean reversion from that spread, not a structural collapse of the thesis.

About Keel: Keel is a Strategy OS for AI-assisted systematic trading on Hyperliquid. Build, backtest, and deploy index strategies — and anything else systematic — in one place. Learn more →

Automate it

Trade systematically on Keel

Keel is a Strategy OS for AI-assisted systematic trading on Hyperliquid. Backtest, optimize, and run live strategies across single-stock perps, indices, and crypto majors — realistic fees, slippage, and funding modeled.

Free to start — connect a Hyperliquid wallet when you’re ready to go live.

What you can do
  • Backtest any strategy with realistic fees, slippage, and funding.
  • Optimize parameter grids by Sharpe, drawdown, hit rate.
  • Deploy live to HL with stops + position limits + funding-aware execution.
  • Iterate with AI — describe a thesis, get a tradeable pipeline.
FAQ

Frequently asked

Why this pairing?

Privacy and DeFi yield sit at opposite ends of the regulatory-risk spectrum. Privacy coins are the maximally-decentralized end (Monero by design, Zcash structurally) and tend to rally on regulatory pressure. New-gen DeFi yield (ENA, ONDO) depends on TradFi rails and on-chain RWAs — it’s more vulnerable to compliance friction. The L/S structure isolates the regulatory-pressure spread.

Both legs are down YTD. How does the basket make money?

The short leg lost more than the long leg. Privacy (-23% YTD avg) outperformed new-gen DeFi (-40% YTD avg) by ~17 points. Long minus short = positive spread. This is the core property of L/S indexes — neither side needs to go up; one side just needs to fall less than the other.

What is the bull case for this?

Two paths: (1) Privacy narrative cycles back — historical pattern is that XMR rallies hard on regulatory pressure or surveillance scandals. (2) New-gen DeFi yield remains structurally challenged — if the TradFi rails story slows or ENA/ONDO mechanics get scrutinized, the short side keeps paying. Either side moving creates spread; both moving creates more.

What is the bear case?

New-gen DeFi rips. ENA recovers if ETH ecosystem flow returns; ONDO benefits from tokenized treasury inflows. If the short basket rallies while privacy remains range-bound, the spread compresses and the trade loses. Mitigation: the L/S structure caps total exposure at the target leverage — drawdowns are bounded, not unlimited.

Is this a real hedge against regulatory crackdown?

Partially. Privacy long benefits from crackdown narrative; DeFi-yield short benefits if RWA rails get scrutinized. But a coordinated multi-jurisdiction action could compress liquidity on both sides simultaneously. The trade is a narrative spread, not a fully-hedged regulatory hedge.